Robbie K here, starting the evening reviews with yet another comedy to grace the silver screen. Tonight’s film is a rehash of the golden era of television (the 70s) cop comedy Chips. What does forty years of sitting in the dust mixed with the modern era of comedy bring to the table? Well my friends that is where I come from, and as always, I’m happy to share my thoughts on the latest “masterpiece” to grace the silver screen. So, let’s roll out shall we?
- Decent Story
- Good Acting Chemistry
- Some bike stunts
Summary: Not going to lie, I didn’t have high hopes for this comedy. Yet to my surprise, Chips actually stepped up to the plate in terms of plot. It feels like an extended episode from the show, that was part action, part crime mystery, and a majority comedy. It was simplistic yes, but it works to bring the entertainment value and energy that the sitcom brought long ago. While the story was decent, the real shining value is the chemistry between the “dynamic duo” that really makes this movie. Dax Shepard for once didn’t annoy me, as his character was balanced, surprisingly deep, and quite useful in the story, compared to some of his other roles. Although still awkward and idiotic, his antics were toned down and complemented by his partner in crime played by Michael Pena. Pena still shows his dynamic acting style, portraying both rough edged street smarts with sexual promiscuity. The stubborn mule Pena plays is blind-sided by his weaknesses, and only Dax’s character can deter him from the trap that is his mind. It was very entertaining (and impressive) to see the energy both brought to the mix, alongside decent character development, kept the movie going. In addition, there were some decent stunts (primarily bike riding) that added zest to the comedy and maybe a little suspense.
- Lazy writing
- Rushed Development
- Not as Funny as hoped
- Perverted at times
Summary: Like many comedies, Chips suffers from some lazy writing at times. I give Shephard props for capturing some antics of the classic show, but his modern style does not give props in terms of unique writing. Let’s face it, most modern comedies are all about the cursing, and while it was slightly diluted, there was unnecessary use of the cursing that wasn’t funny to me. In addition, there were plenty of moments that could have been comedic gold, but the direction took a different path that was rushed and lazy, leaving little wit, surprise, or delivery to maximize laughs. And the perverted aspect, much like the cursing, got pretty old/disgusting quickly. No offense to anyone’s bodies, but there were a couple of scenes where I couldn’t burn the image/concept out of my head, leaving me sicker to the stomach than laughing. As for the Kristen Bell moments, they played a key character development, but her limited screen time was shallow stupidity than entertaining, but hey she did look good doing it. Outside of the comedy, the character development also could have been a little deeper and the suspense a little more if they wanted to expand upon the genre. Yet, when the single objective is comedy, the story often will take a hit.
Chips has the nostalgic feel to it in terms of its plot overall, and a few cameos, but that is where it drops off. I again applaud Shepard and Pena’s chemistry and how they expanded upon characters who were better known for their tight uniforms. Unfortunately, the modern telling is much like the theme of the genre, simplistic stupid moments with a curse laden dialogue and perverted moments. If this is your style, then this movie is the one for you this weekend. For the rest of my readers though, this movie is worth waiting for Netflix before feasting your eyes on this piece. While better than I thought, it would be, it still is no masterpiece.
Movie Overall: 4.0