Bay-Don’t-Watch! Unless You Want Dumb Comedy

baywatch

 

“Are you ready? Never full of fear?” Poor use of the theme song lyrics aside, one might fear for what is to come with the Baywatch movie.  If you’ve read other websites or seen the google news feeds you know this hasn’t been doing well.  Yet the question remains, is it bad enough to deserve lower than 20%?  Robbie K here to ask that question as I hit the theater trenches to scope out the wonders the bay holds in this relaunch.  So once more, here are my thoughts on the latest “hits” of the Hollywood Box Office!”

 

LIKES:

  • Some of the comedy
  • The Beautiful Cast
  • Dwayne the Rock Johnson

 

Summary: If you’ve seen the trailers, you know this movie is going to attempt to be funny, and at times it succeeds. Despite what some reviews say, Baywatch has its clever moments involving slapstick humor and insult bashing.  There are numerous references buried in the sand of this movie, and even more punches at the ridiculousness of the legendary series.  These quips are fun, tasteful, and on many levels so true at how we ate up the drama. And yes, the cameos are certainly fun to watch and well-timed.

But outside of comedy, the main selling point of this movie is the beautiful cast of lifeguards assembled for this movie.  The trailers have not sold you any lies in regards to the anatomy in this movie and the sex appeal contained within.  Female audience members will certainly enjoy the chiseled features of former wrestler Dwayne Johnson and former Disney Channel singing “sensation” Zac Efron. Beefy bodies and plenty of shirtless scenes had a number of my fellow audience members drooling, or at least making sounds. Fear not guys, you’ll get plenty of chances to make your own sounds and gawk at the lovely figures of Alexandra Daddario, Kelly Rohrbach, and Ilfenesh Hadera  These visions of loveliness not only have a little spice to add to the mix, but plenty of “bounce” to their step that brings energy to the film. In regards to the acting of most of the cast, not bad I must say, but many are reduced to mere shadows of what I had hoped to see. All with the exception of one….

The Rock is still cooking up a storm in terms of his acting.  He led the comedy for me with solid delivery and timing, his lines perhaps the best written of the whole cast.  Using his physical attributes, he does some nice stunt work into the mix helping to add excitement to a rather bland movie.  But his greatest contribution is the energy brought to the film, which kept things fun, balanced, and moving at various points. You can guess that this reviewer felt the most solid aspect of the movie… was the Rock.

 

DISLIKES:

  • Most of the comedy
  • Predictable story
  • Zac Efron’s character

 

Summary:  I said there was some witty moments, but we all knew this was going to be a run of the mill modern comedy.  Baywatch is loaded with shallow comedy that is stupid, crude and in many cases lazy writing.  You can guess that much of it is centered on the stereotypical sex jokes, including a few shots of the genitalia itself. Other comedic ploys focus on prolonged banter between two characters, who randomly stop in the middle of a crisis to argue their points…yeah that’s funny.  Yet many jokes involve taking the clever dialogue and quickly dumping it for…yes pointless cursing that quickly grew stale for me.

You would think the story could try to make up some of the shortcomings, but no… that too failed.  It was a predictable plot from start to finish, with all the relationships, turning points, and big twists known within probably 30 minutes. While this should not be too startling, I had hoped that the stunts and suspense could break it up the mundane plot, but this too failed considerably.  I get it, it’s a cute attempt at making an extended episode reminiscent of the show, but the execution was poor and I think that a stand-up comedy approach might have been better.

Yet the worse thing for me was Zac Efron’s character.  Don’t turn click off the review quite yet, hear me out, this is in no way all Efron’s fault.  The former High School Musical star is playing the same role he always does and is starting to go off the deep end.  However, the design of this character was annoying on so many levels that it was hard to not wish a swift end for him.  The development was weak at best, minus a few well-developed scenes, and the fact that he had some of the lamer comedic moments didn’t help things at all.  But when you got the body he built up, I guess you don’t have to do much in this movie to win the favor of the audience.

 

The VERDICT:

 

Baywatch is clever at times and fulfills its promise of shallow laughs, Dwayne Johnson having energy and of course the sex appeal. They certainly polished their actors for this one so that audiences would get a feast for their eyes, but sadly that’s the only thing this reviewer can share.  Baywatch has much balancing to do for the sequel that could come, and really needs to focus on the wittier comedy and less on the innuendos.  Certainly, you should hold out for this movie to grace Netflix or RedBox.

 

My Scores are:

 

Action/Comedy/Drama:  5.5

Movie Overall:  4.0

Advertisements

Set Sails For Calmer Waters: Pirates 5 Drops The Sword For The Comedy Pen

Dead men

 

Avast ye scurvy scoundrels, it be Captain Robbie of the S.S. Review, sailing the seas of the cinema in search of the treasure known as a good movie.  Alas, this weekend Admiral Bruckheimer’s armada set out on a fifth voyage with Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp)

taking the wheel once more. Will this adventure be smooth sailing and reward us with a crown jewel, or will we be drowned in the sea of sorrow at another hand me down adventure? Yo Ho, Yo Ho, A pirate’s life for me, drink up me hardies, sit on your captain’s chair and read my thoughts on Pirates of The Caribbean 5: Dead Men Tell No Tales.

 

LIKES:

  • Character Centered Story
  • Acting
  • Special effects
  • Soundtrack
  • Comedy

 

Summary: When it comes to the plot of these movies, one never knows if they’ll find gold or mere rocks. The fifth installment is fortunately back on the path to good storytelling, focusing on the characters instead of well… immortality. Among the number of scallywags, we get some background on about five of the cast, each with a unique angle to help them stand out.  While certainly not the best story, it is miles above the mess number four was.

The story is a nice component, but the acting is really the aspect that brings the pirate’s life to well…life.  Newcomers like Brenton Thwaites and Kaya Scodelario are a welcome addition that have spunk, class, and a number of other qualities that many will latch onto, (especially the cute factor) and they aren’t bad to look at either. Scaring is way into another antagonistic role, Javier Bardem brings his bag of tricks back to the screen, including the suave accent and cantor that oozes evil.  Of course the main two you are probably coming to see are Geoffrey Rush and Johnny Depp, the legendary captains we fell in love with in the first movie.  Rush is incredible, bringing the sea saltiness and arrogance that is the famous Captain of the Black Pearl.  Depp on the other hand is as enigmatic as ever, capturing the goofiness, lackadaisical attitude of Sparrow with a dash of heroic charm.  Together, the two actors lead not only the character development, but the comedy.  Yes Pirates 5 certainly has the laughs in spades, using every in their arsenal to get a chuckle.  I loved the clever word play, idiotic banter, and comedic timing in this movie, which helped relieve the darker aspects of the film.

Of course, it wouldn’t be a pirate’s movie without incredible special effects.  Yes Disney and Bruckheimer combined their studios to bring the magic back to the screen. Chaotic maelstroms expand across the vast screen, as ships sail across dead infested waters, firing explosive cannons at the specters that haunt the blue.  The journey is certainly beautifully illustrated in a mix of art and excitement, all under the unifying banner of the epic orchestra work we all have come to love.

 

DISLIKES

  • Still shallow story
  • Action scenes somewhat bland
  • Lack of suspense/Simplistic end
  • Worthless cameos

 

Summary:  Alas, despite the jewels that sparkle in the distance, the story still needs some work.  With five main stories, each a different motif to quest for the elusive item, the plot gets spread thin and deprived of real sustenance into the character’s history. Sure, one of the stories has more bite than the others, but this Pirates took a hit in the rich depth we have come to expect. Therefore, the bland characters were lacking at times and not as strong as I had hoped.

Even more bland are the action scenes that they tried to bring to the movie.  Don’t get me wrong, there are some beautifully animated battlegrounds in the movie, it’s just that they lack the same sting I feel in love with.  Where were the epic sword fights between two swashbuckling men amidst dangerous landscapes? Where were the notorious ship to ship battles where a well-placed cannonball and evasive maneuver meant the difference between life and death? And where was the suspense and thrills that kept me on edge all those previous installments?  I’m not sure, but Pirates 5’s action scenes were malnourished forms of battle I loved, with many scenes reduced to pan over shots of extras fighting CGI enhanced ghosts. A few scenes were gaining the potential to be awesome, but comedic relief set in and reduced it to some quick ended scuffle that quickly turned to running.  Glad to know our pirates could have run track.

And finally, the cameos.  While certainly a great tool for nostalgia, most of the cameos were shallow shout outs to the characters we have wondered about.  It allows for some neat little tie ups at times, but these less than 5 minutes screen appearances were missed potential.  Only Paul McCartney, the legendary beetle, was able to pull off an appearance that was worthy of being included… well done Paul.

 

VERDICT:

 

Pirates 5 took a step in the right direction with its returned to character driven story, comedic style, and special effects that scream pirates. However, it still has room to improve to get back to the glory of the first film.  It’s unbalanced at placed, and lacks the excitement of the battles, or an exciting conclusion at all to wrap up the supposed final entry.  Seems they wanted more of a comedy than anything else, and one will certainly enjoy the laughs, and most likely the movie, if you go in for the comedy over everything else.  Worth a trip to theaters?  I’m sure you would still go regardless what I said, but the special effects are certainly worthy of the theater’s sound and video. Yet you could still hold off on this film and check it out at RedBox, because this finale sets up the series for yet another installment.  Finale chapter my butt!

 

Scores:

 

Action/Adventure/Fantasy:  8.0

Movie Overall: 7.0

Everything You Have Seen Before

everything

 

Coming of age movies have come in a variety of styles, packages, and of course quality. While the number of generational novels (and subsequent movies) have increased over the decades, their quality has decreased for many, lost to the gimmick of modern, superficial entertainment it has become. And so here comes yet another addition to the teenage book movie collection Everything, Everything! Interesting title aside, I must admit I didn’t have high hopes for this movie, but nevertheless I’m back in the theater to give you the thoughts on yet another film.  Let’s get it on…figuratively that is.

 

LIKES

  • Good pace
  • Great chemistry
  • Realistic, not annoying
  • Twist

 

Summary:  Okay, when it comes to love stories…we know I find the pace to be slow and often boring, (yes, I’m a robot). However, in Everything, Everything, that trend was finally broken.  No, your eyes are not playing tricks on you my friends, you read right.  Everything, Everything keeps the pace moving, making sure to bring prompt, concise introductions and dive right into the story at hand. No this doesn’t mean they skip over too many things (admit haven’t read the story), but it keeps the adventure going, all while maintaining the romance involved.

What helped accomplish this?  In all honesty, I think it was the chemistry that made the movie, with the two stars Amandla Stenberg and Nick Robinson having a fantastic relationship with each other.  They play off each other’s emotions, seem to like working with other, and maximize the energy they bring to the screen.  It’s like they are actually in love with each other, or at least friends, and that sold the relationship/story for me.  An added bonus is that the relationship felt like a real example of a developing relationship, forgoing the cheap antics of cheesy love that most romantic comedies choose.  They weren’t instantly soul mates or magically destined to succeed.  So, nice to see that portrayed every once in a while.

Yet the main thing that sunk me into the tale was the twist in the story.  It takes a lot to surprise me in movies (I’ve seen so many after all), but this movie was able to covertly hide some nuances that seemed inconsistent were instead hints at what was to come.  While it took place a little late, it really brought the film to full circle and ended the film with a powerful finale.  Nice job my friends… nice job.

 

DISLIKES

  • A slow abridged start
  • A few overacted moments
  • Some odd directions
  • Dropped characters
  • Uniqueness is kind of missing

 

Summary:  I know what you’re thinking, you’re contradicting yourself again.  Hear me out, overall the pace worked for me, but the opening took a little time to take off the ground. The introduction was a little dragged out and slow, merely a compellation of moping scenes with a monologue overlapping to explain the abridged, somewhat underdeveloped details. 

In addition, the movie takes some odd turns in the film, going into some pointless tangents that were odder than anything.  A common metaphor is the astronaut to which she compares her life to, a symbol of being a long individual stuck in the vast, empty void.  Cool symbolism, but it gets lost in these trippy side arcs of the astronaut trying to do mundane tasks in the background while our characters act out their text messages.  I’m guessing it was trying to be funny, but this weirdness was an unneeded distraction that did little but make me think some drugs could have been involved.  Well that and helping distract from some of the more overacted moments. Despite a rich chemistry between each other, there were times that reaction failed to activated, leading too some flat attempts at get tears going.  Fortunately, these eye rolling moments were kept to a minimum.

And while the story was good overall for me, there are still a few other flaws that hit me.  First of all, the trailers spent some time building up a few characters (such as the nurse and for a while the mother), only for them to drop them out of the picture for a long while.  Why the dropped story?  Why the potential for a little emotional build up to really kick things up?  Probably for more kissing and declarations of love I suppose.  Still they cheated us out of some good character interactions, leaving us to explore those components by reading the book.  How dare they!

This brings me to the last dislike, the lack of uniqueness.  Despite the twists, surprises and decent pace, Everything, Everything still lacks that unique touch that we all still look for.  It has all the familiar elements of this genre, with little deviation and originality to compliment on.  If this familiarity is what you want, then great, because that comfort is present in the movie.  However, if you are looking for something with a little more pizazz and originality… then you will want to move along.

 

The VERDICT:

 

Despite lacking originality, this reviewer is pleased to see a quality coming of age movie hit the theaters this weekend.  Everything, Everything certainly has everything you want in a teenage chick flick with a decent pace, good acting chemistry, and a nice twist to spruce things up.  Yet it still is that familiar story of love Hollywood likes and lacks a lot of theater worthy elements that make it worth the admission price.  Therefore, I can recommend this movie for a visit if you’re looking for a good book movie, but I still recommend waiting for Redbox to see this film. 

 

My score is:

 

Drama/Romance: 8.0

Movie Overall: 6.5

Mehlien: The Tactics/Production Are Not Out Of This World

alien covenant

 

Alien… a franchise that has continued to take many forms over the last four decades. While some of its evolutions have been weaker and worthy of forgetting, there have been some forms that will forever hold throne in the realm of good science fiction horror.  Tonight, Alien Covenant launches in US theaters, unfortunately to a mixture of reviews slamming it enough to call it worse than its predecessor Prometheus. So, alongside my friend Jeff, we hit the theaters to see what it’s got after all the buildup and hype.  Robbie K back and as always, I’m here to share my thoughts.

 

LIKES:

  • Back to Alien tactics
  • Danny McBride isn’t a stoner
  • Science Fiction Elements
  • Loose ends somewhat tied up

 

Summary:  Low and behold, Covenant finally returns back to the elements we fell in love with years ago.  Nostalgia runs wild in this movie as Daniels and her colleagues work to survive the nightmare that dwells in this movie.  Narrow Hallways filled to the brim with shadows as the “perfect” organism seeks out its prey, amidst shrieks, acid blood, and that infamous lethal tongue? The gimmicks are all there, alongside the science fiction element this series is famous for.  Biology is certainly one of the topics they focused on this one, in hopes of adding some plausibility and “realism” to the series.  My buddy and I both agreed that this component did some nice damage control and added a unique twist to the mix.

A particular like for me was finally seeing McBride in a new role.  If you’re a fan of classic McBride acting like an idiot constantly on drugs and spouting nonsense, you won’t see that side of him in this film.  For me this is refreshing, and McBride finally crafted a character I didn’t want to punch in the face, but instead relished as he took a major role in the story. While I certainly would have liked a little more him in the film (not something I say often), McBride works on so many levels for me in this film.

Finally, the story element of the movie.  When last, we left the series, Prometheus left so many freaking questions and confusion that we needed another movie to explain the movie.  Good news, Covenant comes in to tie up those loose ends, helping bridge the gap between the new and old and answer some questions we have asked for a while.  In doing so it adds an…interesting element to the mix and doesn’t raise as many questions as Prometheus did…. Thank the lord for that.

DISLIKES:

  • Weak opening
  • Most characters practically worthless
  • Weird gimmicks
  • Overzealous gore
  • Inconsistent story line

Summary: Reading some of my fellow reviewers’ writings I have to agree with many of the dislikes in this movie.  Much has to do with the story, and it starts with the weak, almost pointless opening that causes all the trouble. It’s lazy writing, with a random element thrown in to get things going that barely makes sense other than some special effect firework display. Throw in the pointless cameo (again) and you are left with a bitter taste from the start.

Unfortunately, that’s only the start, for Alien Covenant continues to take hits in the plot development, primarily in the character story aspect. Much of the cast is pretty much pointless outside of being fodder for the aliens, with few having any backstory or an understandable name.  We get it, Aliens is all about nameless characters facing the elements, but the first two installments were successful in integrating some of them into plot and bestow significance. In addition, someone wasn’t paying attention to their details, because Alien Covenant offset some of the details Prometheus set.  While it may not be a big deal to the layman, most fans of the series though are going to notice…yeah, we nerds can be a pain in the butt. Still, I didn’t like some of these lack of attention to detail and will most likely do everything in my power to theorize a story to cover this gap.

Nope… instead this movie wanted to try out some new gimmicks in multiple departments including weird kissing scenes, that notorious black crud, obsessions with “love”, and of course new types of creatures.  I’ll give them points for some originality, but the gimmicks were a little off the wall even for me (who is pretty dang weird).  Even worse, the gimmicks are kind of unnecessary or neatly explained in a single sentence. Instead the new gimmicks, as well as much of the movie was all about the gore.  Alien Covenant keeps to the displays of blood, going strong for the insanely detailed displays of blood (both CGI and real) and people getting torn to bits, by a less impressive looking Xenomorph.

 

The VERDICT

            Aline Covenant is pretty much what you expect from the series since Alien 3 emerged out into the theaters.  It is all about the gore filled hunt, mediocre story, all wrapped in a science fiction exterior.  A plus side is again the Alien tactics and tying up loose ends, but unfortunately it still lacks a lot of story, relevant gimmicks, and balance the first two movies had. Perhaps, should a next one be made, they will tie up more loose ends and obtain a little more storytelling.  In addition, the insane obsession with death and gore might be diluted as well, though I highly doubt this given modern audiences obsession with killing.  Worth a trip to the theater?  For the fans of the series, yes, otherwise hold out until RedBox for this one folk.

 

My scores are:  

Horror/Sci-Fi/Thriller:  7.5

Movie Overall: 6.5

Designed to Snatch Your Money! One-Liners Don’t Make The Movie

snatched

 

The second weekend of May is always a crapshoot when it comes to movies, often with emphasis on first part of the word.  Robbie K is back and in the trenches with another review, starting off with a movie he was despairing to see. I’m talking about Snatched, the latest “comedy” starring Amy Schumer and Goldie Hawn. If you have seen the trailers, you know this movie was painting a pretty “simplistic” picture, and I didn’t have much hopes for it.  What lies behind the sparkly sheen of blonde hair?  Read on my friends to hear my thoughts on the latest movie to hit the big screen.

 

LIKES:

  • Clever at times
  • Goldie Hawn
  • “Touching at moments”
  • Beautiful scenery

 

Summary:  Let’s face it the trailers didn’t establish much potential in the movie, but this reviewer has to admit chuckling at times.  There are some well-timed jokes in this movie, and the delivery itself sometimes is spot on to perfect the humor. Yet the parts that kept me laughing, were the ones involving Joan Cusack and Wanda Sykes, an unlikely cop duo that really works in this movie and maximizes their short screen time.  And while these two are certainly the laughs for me (and a good chunk of the small audience), it was Miss Hawn who stole the show for me.

Okay this wasn’t her best role, but Hawn’s first big screen appearance in a long time was a lot of fun to watch.  Like much of her cast she was funny at times, but what this reviewer liked the most was how balanced they made her character. She was fun, feisty, and the moral compass the film, trying to keep them alive all while trying to be mature.  And yet there was vulnerability, and a little bit of growth that was dare I say “touching” at times. Hawn’s character brings some relevant issues to the table and tackles them in a fun and emotionally fulfilling way.

The best thing, and yes, I’m grasping for straws here, for me in this movie is the beautiful shots of EcuadorCinematography is not usually my favorite part of the movie, but for Snatched, it works as the brilliant countryside and jungle are brought to life via bird’s eye view shots and wide angle pan shots.  The jungle is really brought to life in this film, including the CGI crafted animals that dwell under the foliage. Throw in some fun music to add some pep to it and you get a combination that adds a little “atmosphere” to the movie.

 

DISLIKES:

  • Simplistic story
  • Violent
  • Political Preachy
  • Annoying, Crude Jokes

 

Summary: But where those likes work for me, there are a variety of dislikes that leave an imprint on my mind.  It starts with the story. No surprise, Snatched is going to win any Oscars for its story, which is pretty pitiful for the most part.  Like many modern comedies, the plot is at a bare minimum of the two being kidnapped and trying to get back home. There is little deviation from this frail backbone of a plot, with little character development despite the numerous openings they had.  With two actresses who have quality chemistry, should have been easy to use the mother-daughter relationship to evolve their characters and give the movie some guts.

Instead the character development was replaced by violence and not the cool, special effect kind you find in fantasies.  No, Schumer’s comedy style decides to make the violence mindless accidents that try to be funny, but only come out ridiculous, pointless, and a little insulting at times (usually due to banter). Such simple-minded comedy is welcome occasionally, but much of Snatched comedy is highly overused.

Yet the violence is nothing compared to the political preachiness of the movie.  The touching moments are certainly cheesy, drawn out dialogues reminiscent of 90’s sitcoms.  Yet I would still take these soap box morals compared to the political humor embedded in this film.  Snatched does not sugar coat the platforms Schumer and the crew are stuck on.  And while I give them props for their bravado, the hard-hitting jokes just get old after the 18th, poorly written joke hits your ears. The sexism jokes in particular are not my particular favorites, and are fine examples of stupid writing taking preference over that balanced wit I like.  Unfortunately, this is the nature of the entire movie, stupid one liners, dragged out banter, and ridiculously crude jokes crammed into a 90-minute run time.  Obviously, this is Schumer’s normal style, but in this movie, the lack of few other supportive qualities means the stupidity gets old quickly, primarily Schumer acting like a drunk, whiny brat.

 

 

The VERDICT:

 

No surprise Snatched is not the funniest comedy of the year.  It’s unbalanced, filled with stupidity, stale tactics, and meme worthy stills that will wind up on the internet within the year.  While I know Schumer’s presentation is not the greatest, she is most certainly not the worst thing about the film.  It is instead the lack of any purpose, structure, and story that leaves this movie an annoying mess that is getting low scores.  So, who should go see this movie in theaters?  My observations point to female fans of Amy Schumer’s comedy, otherwise do your best to skip this film and wait for Netflix to pick I up. 

 

My scores are:

Action/Comedy:  5.0

Movie Overall:   4.0

Volume Two Are The Guardians to Comedy

guaridans

 

It’s the first weekend of May and you know what that means?  No not love is in the air!  It means Marvel studios is kicking off the summer movie brigade with another one of their “super” superhero movies.  In this case, the mercenary team takes to the stars again in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 starring Chris Pratt and a bevel of other characters to lead the charge. Will this intergalactic spoof take us to intergalactic heights, or has it burnt out like a white dwarf?  Robbie K is back with another review, and as always, I appreciate the views.  Let’s get started shall we.

 

LIKES:

 

  • Visual Style
  • Edgier
  • More Action Than the First
  • Comedy Gold
  • Another golden soundtrack

 

Summary: When guardians comes to mind you probably think of a lot of… weird things.  However, if you get past the trippiness of the idea, you’ll see some impressive visuals to get your adventure going.  Marvel studios once ore shows of their special effects prowess, bringing you a display of interstellar stars, explosive laser fights, and unique planets with odd environments. Guardians 2 will have your eyes watering at all the explosions of color and the beautiful actors that inhabit the artificially created setting.  And no lie, it certainly warrants a look in 3-D given everything they stuffed into the film.

Yet with the impressive displays comes the ability to add edge to the movie, and volume 2 brings it in spades. While certainly lighthearted at times, the second addition to the franchise is much darker than its predecessor.  Graphic deaths, hate filled dialogue, graphic violence, and some disturbing visuals are just some examples of this edge, and warrant caution when bringing the kiddos to see it.  Good news though, this edge also dropped a barrier holding back the action, because Volume 2 is loaded with more battles than its predecessor.  Much like Star Wars, the ship and laser battles are loud, flashy, and suspenseful (at times), feeling like a haphazard mess that is perfect for this galaxy. It is not the most spectacular, but it gets the job done and brings loads of laughs with it.

Speaking of laughs, Guardians biggest selling point is the comedic gold buried in the star filled void. The film got a lot of things right, including dynamic comedy styles, such as innuendos, insults, and clever references, each balanced to keep the chuckles coming. And it was only amplified by the fantastic timing and delivery by our talented cast of actors.  Of all the cast, I think Rocket and Drax are the funniest, with Drax’s lines being the best timed and delivered, while Rocket had the edge and best writing. Bottom line is, I have not laughed this hard at the movies in the long time and hope you enjoy it as much as I did.  One last thing, the soundtrack is on point again filled with a variety of classics to make your toes tap or get that last emotion out.  In addition, they use some of the songs as a fantastic comedy device, once more illustrating the creativeness at Marvel studios.

 

 

 

 

DISLIKES:

  • Action is not dynamic
  • Drawn out/Cheesy moments
  • Semi Lame villain again
  • The story elements not as tight

 

Summary:  This section was hard to come up with, but here were a few things on the weaker side for me. It starts with the action. I know, Guardians is a comedy movie, but it still portrayed with heavy action moments.  To some degree this is true, but the action is not as dynamic as some of Marvel’s other films.  Much of it is simplistic shooting and monotonous ship battles that slightly differ with a setting change or a different ending to the conflict. When they try to add a little diversity, these moments become drawn out, overdramatic moments that feel like something from the third matrix movie without the intense suspense. They do get points back for some clever spoofs and supporting dialog, but Guardians has a lot of work to do in the action department to rival some of the greater films.

One thing that could help this is to actually cast or develop their main villains to have some more bite to them. In this film, I had difficulty determining who was going to be the primary villain, which made a lot of those drawn-out moments and “suspenseful” battles lacking to me.  Why they keep trying to make these grandiose blowhards whose skills are pathetic is beyond me, but hey grandiosity is the Guardians attaché. Something else that was hard to get on board with the looser story design of this film. It wasn’t linear, and much of the arcs didn’t seem to tie together as I think they envisioned, that is until the end where things hastily tied up. And for me, there was lots of obvious foreshadowing that gave much of this movie away, and if you pay attention you can have everything predicted in 15-30 minutes.  In addition, the Nebula arc had some guts behind it, but still didn’t sit well with me given all the stories crammed into one movie and how incomplete they felt at times.

 

The VERDICT:

 

The epic trailers did the movie justice, for the most part, and Guardians 2 has plenty of awesome factors that will entertain the masses.  It’s special effects and action are exciting, and the edgier atmosphere opens up for darker plots and comedy that many will like (alongside the killer soundtrack). Yet the story isn’t as put together and some of the drawn-out moments could have been edited down to restore the balance they were seeking. Nevertheless, and as if I could stop you, this movie is one for the theaters, though I warrant caution to those looking to take young ones due to the edge of the film. 

 

My scores are:

 

Action/Adventure/Sci-Fi:  8.5

Movie Overall: 8.0