Gas Up The Engines And Drive Out To See This Rivalry

Ford v Ferrari Poster

 

When it comes to cars we like them fast and furious, or at least for many that is the dream as handling the monster speed can be overwhelming.  So that’s where racing comes in, a means to extend one’s self into the faceless visage of a Nascar or Formula One in hopes of seeing their heroes win.  Yet, what goes into a racecar?  For the die-hard fans and car enthusiasts they understand the mechanics behind it, but for fans like me, well there is a lot more under the hood of the vent.  Today’s movie is all about the battlefield of racing, though perhaps more of a look into the window of the past in the international racing venue.  Tonight we look at the rivalry between two big car empires, in their battle for supremacy as I review:

 

Movie: Ford Vs. Ferrari (2019)

 

Director:

James Mangold

 

 

 

LIKES:

 

Surprisingly Decent Pace

Funny

Plenty Of Character Integration

Seeing the Rivalry From Many Sides

The Technical Jargon Mixed Well

The Musical Score

The Sound Effects

The Heart

The Finale Of Racing

 

DISLIKES:

 

The Predictability

Loudness

The Drama Vs. Reality

A Little More Integration Of The Wife

The Ending After The Race

 

SUMMARY:

 

Biography dramas usually don’t run at a pace that entertains me fully, but Ford Vs. Ferrari succeeded in this endeavor and put the pedal to the medal in storytelling.  The elements of describing the business deals, politics and even development of the car are all a carefully blended together to be engaging without being overbearing for this reviewer.  It finds a way to make all this business jargon funny, putting just enough spite, attitude, and stubbornness to work and masterfully relieving the dialog heavy plot.  What impressed me even more though was seeing the character integration into this film, finding ways to make characters I care about and how I hoped the policies would not shoot them in the foot, which is key to helping me stay invested in a drama.  Bale in particular was my focal point, his character having the most lines cast out and the central engine that drove this car.  He plays the part well, adds that charm he brings to many of his roles, and then melds with the rest of the teams.  Throw in all the dialogue filled with the jargon and you had me feeling like I was part of each group in the decision to battle the big boys.

However, despite all the heart of the film, most fans are going to want to know how the special effects department works in this film.  Good news, for America’s love of making things loud, bold, and powerful continues on this look back into the past.  For guys like me, the musical score at times amps up the elements with its background noise augmenting the scene and making my skin goosebumps rise in that emotional way.  Now add the layer of the sound editing and effects and you get the major effect of this movie.  Those who love to listen to their engines roar as they fly down the street, or identify the clicks of the perfect transition to the next gear are going to love this movie.  All those elements brought together with the theater sound drop you into the driver seat and gets the blood pumping.  Finally, combine that with the visuals and you’ve got yourself a movie that somehow takes what many consider a dry sport of turning left and instead give you the dynamic element of being in this life or death thrall.  When combined with the story, it’s magic and gives a purpose to remain entertaining, which can be very difficult in a racing movie without gimmicks (comedy of the Love bug or action of the Fast and Furious).

 

Despite the realistic nature of this film though, it still has some elements I would have liked to see curbed.  One, the predictability of the film is still there from the foreshadowing alone, though if you know the history of this movie’s plot you’ll of course predict the ending (which I didn’t).  Despite the appreciation for the special effects, yours truly has sensitive ears, so the full volume of the engine roaring can be a little painful/ingratiating if not careful.  These minor components aside, the movie’s constant question of drama vs reality comes into question, and I feel there was a lot of magic integrated into the film compared to the reality.  It adds entertainment, but I wonder just how much of this was true to paint the characters a little more notably, more so Matt Damon’s character or the arrogant vice president.  In terms of further character integration, I would have liked a little more of the wife, who though was involved throughout the film, felt there was a little more she could have had in here to really pull the film to full circle.  My biggest dislike though was the last twenty minutes of the film, which I will not spoil.  The film had another point that I felt would have been better to end, and while I understand why they did the last part in terms of closure, the last 15-20 minutes could have been edited down where I think the true story ended, wrapped up with a nice information card montage they do.  It’s times like these where the last piece is placed that sometimes throw me the wrong way, but I will of course recognize the honor and work they did do in those final moments.

 

The VERDICT:

 

Overall, Ford Vs. Ferrari delivered what I expected and more.  It was a drama/biography that was not boring to watch, with a pace that like the car continued to work and immersed you into many aspects of the war between these two.  A fantastic balance of story with technical prowess is going to be the entertaining factor for much of the audience and looking at the people around me during my showing should impress the target audience.  Sure, it’s predictable, a little time bloated, and loud, but the only factors are potentially the movie magic blowing things out of proportion and the potential ending that really had me bugging.  Otherwise, outside of not being the most original idea or the most dynamic telling of a story it works for a trip to the theater.

 

My scores are:

 

Drama/Biography/Sports:  8.5

Movie Overall:  7.0

Off the Chaney? Vice Review

Vice Poster

 

The world today is a politically charged place and with it comes a war of opinions, views, and media mayhem that many thrive on. So of course we have Hollywood raring to go, bringing a production of its own to toss into the game and hopefully wow.  So Robbie K is here to give his opinions on that movie as he reviews the latest film:

 

Movie: Vice (2018)

 

Director:

Adam McKay

Writer:

Adam McKay

Stars:

Christian BaleAmy AdamsSteve Carell

 

 

LIKES:

 

  • The Makeup
  • The Editing
  • The Presentation, somewhat
  • The Pace
  • The Acting
  • The Explanations

 

Summary:  Hands down my appreciation of this movie starts in the art of making the characters come to life in their looks.  Hollywood’s resources of time traveling makeup artists continue to be abundant as Vice brings their talents to new levels.  Creating Chaney in all his ages alongside his family is spectacularly done, transforming Bale and his colleagues into the various political players of the game.  It’s sleek, it’s beautiful and worthy of an Oscar award in my opinion.

Past that though, the rest of the movie is very well presented at parts to grant you a political biography that is certainly comedic at times.  The editing work of integrating their characters into real life footage is certainly impressive, keeping you immersed into the film without losing too much screen time for the actors.  Speaking of which, the acting is super well done, with Bale obviously getting top billing for how well he matched Chaney’s mannerisms and presentation quite well from the footage I’ve seen.  The rest of the cast supports them well in this semi-political farce working to bring the turmoil of the political warfare into the screen.

  Yet the thing this reviewer appreciates in regards to the presentation, outside of the impressive recreation of events and use of footage, is the sort of semi-narrative taking place to explain what is going on. The history of acts, scandals, and who was involved in what escapes me since leaving high school, but this movie is there to fill in the gaps.  As the narrator takes you through the times in a semi-quick pace, one begins to learn the various acts and ratifications Chaney went through in his supposed goals and plans. As such, one should have a small compass to guide them through all the red tape and get to the end, even if you are not up to date on the latest history of our politicians.  Thus, it’s not too hard or boring to follow.

 

DISLIKES:

 

  • The Presentation At Times
  • Episodic At Times
  • More Integration Of Other Characters
  • The Jaded Energy

 

Summary:  When it comes to artistic style, you give them points for originality and creativity, but that indirect manner sometimes was a little convoluted.  The back and forth between time periods, the representation of Chaney fishing, and the nonlinear presentation muddied up the water for an already heavy story.  In addition, all of Chaney’s historical “triumphs” felt very chopped up, the episodic principles sort of thrown up in the air and landing in bite sized pieces that had just enough sustenance to whet your appetite, but not provide the most power it had for the drama component that I think the trailers painted.

Instead the film focused more on the comedy aspects, sort of looking to point out Chaney’s involvement in politics from a certain point of view. For one thing, the characters were very extreme, grandiose displays of political characters that while impressively acted, was a little lacking in terms of the characters the trailer painted. The comical approach is certainly unique, but I guess I was expecting a little more of the biography component than the farce they chose to approach.  Certainly, the biggest limitation for audience members might be the jaded energy this movie has to offer.  Like the new stations of cable television, this film presented Chaney’s reign from a certain angle, some of which is based on truth and some of which could be Hollywood magic. If you are a particular side of the political spectrum, you might just find yourself angry with the movie, rather than entertained or engaged by the political venue displayed.

 

The VERDICT:

 

The Critics certainly have got the right idea about praising Vice as the work of art in terms of editing, acting, and make up get mad praise for the investment made in these areas.  Yet in terms of the story and drama the trailers painted for me, the film doesn’t quite agree with the atmosphere in the trailer for me.  If you agree with the views of this team, the film will be right up your alley, but depending on your political alignment and your views on Chaney, the jaded presentation may not be the style you want.  So is this movie worth the trip to the theater.  The answer is kind of, but only if you are ready for a dryer comedy version of the Fox or CNN News presentation.  Otherwise, wait for this one to come to home viewing. 

 

My Scores are:

 

Biography/Comedy/Drama: 6.0-6.5

Movie Overall:  5.0

A Hostile Slow Pace With a Savagely Disjointed Plot

Hostiles

 

Award nominated movies get so much hype this time of the year, praised by critics and users alike.  However, depending on your tastes, these films are much slower, deeper, and less entertaining than the traditional blockbuster that floods the theater.  And this week, the general release of Hostiles starring Rosamund Pike and Christian Bale hits the theaters.  Seeing a Western mosey into the theaters again, I had high hopes for this movie shining like the awards suggested it would.  What is the verdict?  Robbie K is back in the dark trenches to give you his thoughts on yet another film piece.  Let’s get started.

 

LIKES:

The Cinematography/Setting: One thing this movie has going for it, is being shot out in the wilderness frontier.  Hostiles is a beautiful display of this beautiful country, jam packed with jaw dropping spectacles of the Midwestern Plains. Dynamic angles and multiple setting help bring you into the theme of the Wild Wild West and get integrated into the world.  And given that this story involves a lot of walking, it’s good to have this cinematography supporting the treks of our wandering band of travelers.

 

The Acting:  You can tell I appreciate good performances, and Hostiles have an aggressive performance that is indeed Oscar worthy.  With Bale as the leading name, this former vigilante moves from Gotham City to the historical forts of the 19th century.  His rough edge works well as a disgruntled, tortured Civil War captain, bringing that hurt out in his steel gaze and tempered delivery.  Heroic and honor still dwell in the character, and Bale is able to keep all these pieces aligned to craft the interesting character. As for Pike, her character at first was annoying, but they bounced back and crafted an incredible, resilient warrior whose layers extended past the traumatic dismay of her story.  All the supporting characters of military personnel and Native American families were top notch, though their characters dialogue and roles were limited and not as fleshed out.

 

The Culture/Messages:  Hostiles is definitely Oscar worthy in terms of the cultural representation contained in this movie.  This time of adventure was certainly exciting, but perhaps one of the hardest times due to all the hostility the country was in.  Hostiles visualizes that environment quite well, bringing a realistic portrayal of this struggle and how life is so fragile. However, amidst all the traditions, violence, and hate, there are rays of light that attempt to outshine the darkness/hate.  Hostiles representation of forgiveness, honor, courage, and Native American tradition and the artistic presentation is solid and less preachy than some other tales.  Such strong lessons in lessons in an emotionally charged portrayal will hopefully hit you deep down.

 

The MusicThese movies are often known for their musical scores, and Hostiles is another grand example of symphony magic.  Amidst all the traditions, dense dialogue, and savagery is a fantastic score that adds to the emotions of each scene. Brass instruments lead the charge of the battles, while delicate woodwinds add tranquility to the more peaceful parts.  Yet it’s the final scene of the movie that holds my favorite track, a combination of everything to bring that film to an emotion packed ending. 

 

DISLIKES:

Depressing:  I like movies with a darker plot, it allows for more options and a dynamic story that is less predictable.  However, I’m not a fan of movies that are terminally depressing, no matter how educational they may be. Hostiles will leave you down and exhausted with everything that transpires, primarily in the Game of Thrones like atmosphere that hangs over the traveling band.  Don’t expect to keep your spirits bright at the end of this film friends, because there isn’t much happiness to gleam.

 

Long:  The movie is only over two hours long, but to this reviewer it felt more like four hours.  Hostiles is a movie that has a lot of challenges to develop our characters, but it was not an exciting journey for me to be honest.  While this one felt more like a traditional Western film, the movie failed to integrate much excitement for me to get it going.  There were a couple of suspenseful battles in the mix, but the movie resorts to walking through the woods and drama more than anything.  Had the story been more engaging, this would have worked, but that even failed to impress me outside of the morals it taught.  Given these limitations for me, this movie could have delivered the same messages in half the time.  So, bottom line, movie is long and not that entertaining to the traditional crowd.

 

Story Editing:  The underlying message to this movie is the development of Bale’s character in breaking open the hard-edged soldier and revealing the human beneath.  Sadly, the way they go for this, while artistic, was convoluted, sporadic, and kind of pointless.  The opening act held potential in the thrilling hike through the wilderness with a hostile enemy in pursuit.  However, this component is dropped and a new tangent is introduced.  The movie continues this trend and the writers seemed to throw these random, convenient moments in the mix to try to stir things up.  These disjointed plot devices, didn’t flow well with me, and these sudden character introductions were lazy without any mention in proceeding conversations. Even the dialogue is mediocre, accurate to the time period, but low amplitude and containing little pertinent details. And when they get to the more emotional moments, they are reduced to quick montages that are over in a pinch.  As for the ending when the final journey is reached, that final conflict was a messy end that was hastily developed and not really worthwhile in the grand scheme.   

 

The Verdict:

            Hostiles is again one of those time period movies that holds much realism in the forests and frontier of the West.  The visuals take center stage on this movie, with acting and moral lessons granting an excuse for a big budge stroll through the wilderness.  However, this true Western is very drawn out, with heavy handed drama that is depressing and savage in its own right.  In addition, the disjointed story does not help support these darker moments for me to give major credit outside of symbolic representation of fighting the demons we all battle.  So, while this movie is artistic, thought provoking, and realistic, it’s also not as entertaining as I like in a film.  Therefore, I can’t recommend this one for theaters and encourage a visit at home theater to be honest. 

 

My scores:

 

Adventure/Drama/Western:  7.0

Movie Overall:  5.0