The Menu Is An Original Combination Of Horror and Comedy Elements

            Horror movies are the genre that are the most experimental or the most cliché depending on the director steering the helm.  Go too far in either direction and you lose a wide array of people who reduce the movie to trash.  As such, the war for new and tamed continues in hopes of finding the balanced work from it.  Tonight, another movie tries to make its mark on the world in hopes that it will be incredible and really deliver on the “masterpiece” promised by the trailers.  Will it work?  Robbie K thanking you for your time and reading as I review:  

Movie:  The Menu (2022)

  • Director
  • Writers

LIKES:

The Atmosphere:  The truly elevated piece of the film is the atmosphere that has been “cooked” up in this movie.  The Menu is all about establishing an atmosphere to match both the horror and the character qualities that take the screen.  It’s refined, a truly elitist taste, that feels satire against the cooking shows that plague television these days.  All the guests, well almost all of them, having this same culture that truly mixes well with the themes of the movie.  Between the looks, the filming, and the touch of music with more silence interluding, the uncomfortable disturbance of the movie is really well set in this film, and lingers quite well. 

The Message:  A movie that knows how to use a message as the storytelling prowess of the movie is a truly artistic skill to have.  Mylod’s direction with the Reiss and Tracy story is fantastic when it comes to being the representation of one part of the world’s culture.  It’s brilliant in seeing the design of the story, driving the entire moment that really puts the cherry on top to this dessert of despair.  I myself also liked the gradual revelation, seeing the story opening up and adding more levels of depth to an otherwise limited setting that seldom moves from the dining hall.  And, to my surprise, the symbolism in it is well crafted, but not cocky or in your face like others do the level of being pretentious or hard to follow.  It all works very well and balances common and more avid movie going.  

The Storytelling To An Extent:  Again, it is smart storytelling, with layers added in a pace that works for the theme of this movie.  The Menu contains items that are one part character focus, one part political commentary, and one part horror that somehow align into a meal that is very engaging to watch.  It’s not quite as one-dimensional or simplified like many of these movies do, again giving you an elevated character that smashes the ceiling in terms of a good character for us to work against.  Even the “heroes” of the story have their own layers, escaping the usual fodder of the horror genre who are idiots to an extent.  As for the horror component, it’s there, but not to the way you might expect or think.  This movie is much more realistic than any paranormal dream slayer or undead machete slasher could hope to achieve.  It’s that realism that is the terror, but yet, there is more than the simple demented realm that we see in these roles.  All of that leads to a very artistic tale that is the meat of this cinema dish and that’s what you should go in with if you dare.  

The Pace Is Okay At Times:  This film has enough movement and limited time to not get lost in on itself for most of the runtime.  Because of the allure and the suspense of figuring out what is going on, you have that line that pulls you along to keep you guessing what will happen.  As more characters get their hand in the pot, you again get some wow factor to help shock you and turn the heat up in this message heavy movie.  With all this, it plays nicely with the rest of the themes mentioned, allowing for a pace that is not completely a snooze fest in the grand scheme of movies, unlike Tar, for me. 

It’s Tamer Than You think:  Those expecting the shock factor to be gory, disturbing, dissection of the human body can breathe a sigh of relief.  While The Menu is certainly not something for weaker constitutions, it also isn’t the most vivid imagery of people dying in the way the trailers paint.  I may be revealing a little by saying the gross factor is minimized, but I hope it will allow others to give this movie a try.  Sure, there are moments that are going to be difficult to watch, but again the writers and director have marinated the movie with a more refined filter than others might have wielded.  And that was one part very welcoming for me. 

The Acting: By far is the acting of the movie is what was my favorite aspect of the film.  Why?  Because all of this writing and atmosphere is brought together with the powerful performances of the cast presented today.  I’ll say again that every performance is master chef level in the mannerisms and meticulous nature these rolls brought, and the chemistry works well to bring light to the movie.  I can also say the limited roles for such an ensemble were maximized, but I’ll only be focusing on the top three again.  Hoult is my least favorite of the three, only because of how top notch the other two were.  Hoult plays the part well, capturing so much enthusiasm, slyness, and energy that his role required, again mirroring the language one finds on several cooking shows.  And as his character has more time to simmer, we find new levels that come from his acting as the night requires him to do.  Taylor-Joy is my next to talk about, this young woman is extraordinary in what she is able to do with her acting abilities.  Though she may feel a bit one note at times and in the same role, she adds these slight changes that give them light.  For The Menu, she once again does this super well, and gives her rogue character more personality, charm, and a bit more lighter qualities than what she often drinks in with her work. The way she plays and changes her approach in the film is remarkable though, and like her character, adapts to the need of the movie.  And she does it so naturally that there is very little acting seen in the movie to be cheesy.  But it’s Fiennes who wins the best for me.  Voldemort’s actor is so much more than yelling out spells and whispering.  In this film, he does so much for an antagonist, actually making me like him compared to other villains, because of the complexity he brings to the character.  Face changes, posture, delivery of lines, and his looks are a powerful dish that really surprised me for the type of character the head chef became.  One that went beyond the trailer portrayal and gave me something much deeper and elegant than I expected, with the acting to really sell the part. 

DISLIKES: 

The Pacing:  I know, it sounds controversial right?  Trust me, it was when writing this review.  The Menu is indeed conscience of the time it has, utilizing it well, but, depending on what you are walking into, you might find yourself bored by this film.  The Menu is not going to be the typical slasher fighting film, and it isn’t the supernatural themed telling you might hope it would be.  If you want the usual tropes and on the edge of your seats thrills, this movie will bore you absolutely.  However, past that, there are times where it gets a little stuck up on itself and becomes a little boring at the same time.  Without the rest of the crew getting more in depth, their asides are trying to be more comedic than meaningful and it bloats the movie a bit.  I don’t think it is the worst change of pace, but just beware and curb your expectations. 

Semi Dark:  It’s a horror movie, so you might expect this angle to of course, and perhaps even more from the theme of this movie.  And you would be right!  However, there are elements that are a tad darker and more dismal than the usual genre trope.  That realistic mood is indeed part of the terror but it’s also a bit disturbing and depressing at the same time and may affect some people to the wrong extent.  Those kinds of things are good for the message, but for entertaining, I might have steered aways from the whole madness with it. As such, I just caution those to be careful if choosing to tackle this beast. 

Character Stories Are Trivial:  Most characters in this movie are the message representers and the big political statements of the film.  Certainly there are stories to be held, but they pale in comparison to the amazing stuff they accomplished with the other characters.  Two particular characters get the story element, but the others are again just representations of the culture they wanted to dramatize.  It makes for rather forgettable crew, perhaps the point, but The Menu held so much promise for deeper characters had they followed a more traditional formula.  Again I don’t hate it, but it’s a bit of a letdown in comparison to the magic they crafted. 

The Comedy Is Inconsistent:  The Menu is labeled as a comedy and in truth it is to an extent of more elevated level of jokes to fit with the dark tone of the movie.  At times, it is satisfying, the taste of the sarcasm or the attitude fantastic in what they tried to do.  However, at the same time the comedy sometimes tries to be a bit too elevated for me, that it is a bit cheesy for me.  When you get to the poetic nature and the attempts at sarcasm get a little over the top and lose the finesse.  Adding more of that symbolic irony in helps to lighten the darker tone, but I felt also took away from the horror edge they were going for.  I’m sure this more sensitive than other audience members, but it is a minor dislike for me given again the expectations I went in for the movie. 

Not As Shock Factor As You think:  This is both good and bad as mentioned above.  Good in that we weren’t grossed out by the potential content, bad because we are missing the edge that came with the film.  The Menu tries to keep some level of thrill in it and it succeeds with again 1 character.  However, the nature of the film sort of buffers the thrill factor a bit more and the comedy only further dilutes what could have been a bit more hectic adventure.  There are inconsistent attempts to try and change the menu or give more splendor, but overall, it’s just a bit limited for me and again takes that entertaining thrill that comes with this genre a tad too much for me.  

The VERDICT: 

            All this leads to the following for this movie.  The Menu is indeed impressive in terms of the refinement to the Horror genre and how elegant the film is.  You can savor the realism and the atmosphere of the movie, and enjoy the terror from that angle alongside the great character/message themed story.  It’s a very smart film, that plays well with the topics it set out to discuss, while also unleashing a great quality of acting that ties everything together int his movie.  Originality is definitely heavy in this film and that artistic approach is a nice break from the usual elements that these films choose to haunt.  And yet, that elevation does diminish a few other returns in the movie depending on what you expected from the trailers.  Several of the characters are lame fodder, and the pacing suffers a bit because it lacks the cut of the Horror knife.  There were also some inconsistencies in trying to expand the movie that sometimes did work, and other times were a miss for me in what it took away in that attempt.  Overall though, the movie is an experience that is garnished with quality, but may not be the shocking event you expected it to be.  With all this in mind, The Menu gets: 

Horror/Comedy:  7.5-8.0

Movie Overall: 7.0

No Time To Blink: A Lot Of Elements In Craig’s Fifth Film

            England’s most lethal weapon returns for a fifth run this weekend, and he is hoping to unleash the biggest spectacle of the five part series.  James Bond’s journey has been an interesting one, with so many actors, restarts, and iterations to make his mark over the decades for just about every age group.  And despite the mixed reviews of the current series, alongside the politics, the fifth movie is hoping to be the major mark to seal Craig’s journey in this role, assuming they don’t renew the contract again.  Will this mission be a success, or are we once again let down from the anticipation.  Robbie K coming at you with yet another review a she reviews:  

Movie:  No Time To Die (2021)

No Time To Die: Opening Credits Explained - RocketNews
  • Director

LIKES: 

No Time To Die Final Trailer 2021 Movieclips Trailers ...

Great Opening: 

Bond movies often start with action that is primarily meant to get you wrapped into the movie with big bangs. However, this Bond takes things differently and helps add to the story and continuation from the last film.  The opening starts laying down the framework quite well, alongside some foreshadowing, and adds the personal character quality Bond films sometimes lack.  Throw in the artistic Bond songs that Craig’s legacy is accompanied by and it’s a promising start to the film. 

Emotional/Character Driven: 

Craig’s movies have held a lot more personal connections with his Bond than others I have seen (though I have many to still watch), and this film was certainly a lot more charged on character development.  The alliances, friendships, and rivalries go rather deep in the film and seeing them tested added more layers past the usual sleeping/shooting/spying elements that Bond is famous for displaying.  Though a little overdramatic at times, this extension of character was nice to have in this movie and helped up some of the stakes in the movie, always a nice way to get engaged.  

The Costumes/Setting:

Bond is the international man of mystery and that often means exotic locations, interesting settings, and glorious costumes to bring the poise that Bond holds.  No Time To Die continues the trend of immersing you in the spy business by taking us across the globe and getting a very small taste of the culture and beauty.  Some of these settings are breathtaking venues, outside in the natural splendor of the countryside and towns.  Others, are your typical strongholds for the Bond villain, the battlegrounds for spy vs. terrorist to match wits and bravado.  They all felt very Bond to me, and once populated with the extras, only further helped immerse us into the high class world of Bond.  The dresses and tuxes were stunning as ever when they emerged, and seeing some of the cool spyware to decorate Bond’s action suit were always fun to relive in seeing what the creative minds crafted this time.  

The Action: 

This Bond is not the most action packed of the Craig films, but when the action does come up, it is quite satisfying at times.  There are at least two battles from this movie that stick in my mind, both getting the blood pumping with the choreography designed.  One is an awesome display of Bond’s skills vs. the lackeys of the bad guy and the impressive gun toting the license to kill brings with it.  My favorite one though, is the second battle of the film, which held a lot of spectacle, plenty of character involvement, and even some comedy twisted into the mix.  Bond does not elevate the action too far past the limits of the spy game and keeps it familiar with the physics of the world, which should please many. It’s spaced out decently as well to keep things interesting as well, with little interruption in the plot or character development, which is an extra victory for me. 

The Acting: 

The strongest aspect of the movie for me, the acting is fantastically smooth as the shifting into gears Bond seems to have with driving his cars.  Craig’s portrayal of the spy is amazing as always, with the look, attitude, and bravado needed to take on the world.  In this film, the emotional side of him comes out a little more, and much like The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, he does a nice job of bringing those emotions out without treading too far into one dimensional portrayal.  His performance was believable, he seemed to blend well with all the characters and had a natural chemistry with each person he interacted with.  As for Ana De Armas, the knockout look of a Bond girl was amazing on her, and the dress she wore complimented her beauty in a natural way.  Yet, the woman has got some incredible moves and the attitude of an agent, with great action sequences that show promise for her in future roles.  But her comedy style works very well int his movie, edging into the role very calmly and amplifying a role I wanted to see more of, but thoroughly enjoyed the time I got with her.  As for Malek, the man continues to flex his acting muscles and hit the villain role decently well.  Malek’s approach worked for this Bond villain, an uncomfortable edge that was one part horrifying and one party mastermind to push the events of the movie along.  His monologues are executed with theater like quality, and he seems to be living the words that he is testing Bond’s mind with and I loved the nonverbal acting he used to support it.  Lea Seydoux hit the lead Bond girl role super well, a combination of brains, character moments, and beauty that really painted a wonderful character to share the story with.  Everyone else did a great job, but I need to move on to the rest of the reviews.  

DISLIKES: 

No Time to Die Release Date, Cast, Story, Box Office, Review

A Little More Action:
I won’t lie, I would have liked a few more action scenes like what I got in the second fight, with coordination and intensity that had me on the edge of my seat.  Sadly, some of the other bouts are short lived fights on wheels that have some impressive stunts, but get a little carbon copy for my tastes for necessary action.  Even the last part of the movie needed some extra flair for me, primarily in using other characters in the mission then just Bond alone.  

More use of Paloma and The Other Agent:

One of the biggest things I wanted was for use of the other characters past talking roles, or at least involving them in more scenes throughout the movie.  The thing about No Time To Die, is that several characters felt underutilized for me and had so much to offer.  Ana De Armas is one of those characters, whose talents and mystery could have really helped the rest of the movie in pacing, comedy, and maybe a few different aids to assist with finding clues to the mystery.  Lashana Lynch as Naomi, was also needed more for me, especially when I got to see the rivalry between James and her.  She’s got a set of moves of her own as well, and I can’t lie and say I would have liked to see her get her hands dirtier as well and show off the gadgets and guns that the agency gave her.  

More Gadgets; 

This Bond series seems to have forfeited the gadgets that made the series famous years ago.  No Time To Die has a small arsenal of unique tools designed by Q, but the imagination for bringing gizmos to further help our spy get out of sticky situations is slim pickings.  This Q may be funny and a genius, but he certainly does not have the same ingenuity that his previous iterations held long ago.  

Predictable Story: 

If you know the backstory of this current Bond franchise, then you should know how the story is going to go from all the foreshadowing they give in the first thirty minutes.  No Time To Die has plenty of bread crumbs to follow and give you the ending way before the 2.5 hour run time is complete.  Though there are a few twists to try and sweeten the deal, the movie does not quite have the same punch or surprise it once had when these ideas were fresher.  Regardless, the movie is enjoyable despite the predictable twist, which is why this is only a minor twist to say the least. 

A Lot Of Stories Crammed Into One:  

As I said earlier, the current Bond’s story is a lot thicker than the other tales I’ve seen in my Bond viewings.  I’ve enjoyed the deeper tale, mystery and connections to him and each chapter has managed to add a fitting piece of the puzzle to help elaborate more to the history of England’s finest.  However, in this film, a lot of those elements were getting put back in, attempting to answer the lingering questions and push the character development for the agent.  I’d say they did a nice job on some of the plot elements, but others felt a little forced in, side paths that offered some clues to the overall mission that made them needed, but not up to the same skills as other elements were.  A novelization of this movie might better explore those concepts, but from a strict movie standard, the multitude of ideas feels a little too much to address all avenues to the full extent they needed.  I can’t say more without spoilers, so I’m moving on to my biggest dislike of the movie… the villains.  

The Villains:  

Rami Malek is so good in his performance and delivered big time on the role of the egotistical villain who was lost in his own views of the world.  However, he’s also the villain whose direction was not my favorite compared to some of the others we’ve seen in this branch.  Unlike the mysterious man behind the mask approach I thought we were going to get, Safin’s role is primarily monologues and that awkward way of phrasing that gets under your skin.  Yet unlike villains like Jaws, Goldfinger, or even Mr. White, he does not offer more than that and it makes for a somewhat boring villain give again the potential he held from the beginning.  My preference of Bond villains, are those that hold those factors that stand out, or are a true threat to not be crossed lightly or you pay the consequences.  Sure there are minions as well, but even these guys feel a bit wasted, simplistic, and forgettable in the long line of Bond henchmen.  Fortunately, the story elements merge well with this style of villain to assist with the lackluster antagonists, but given the earlier part of the franchise, I’d expected more for Malek’s caliber of acting to raise up. 

The VERDICT: 

No Time to Die Director & Cast Wrote Scenes During Filming ...

Of the five bond films in this actor’s repertoire, No Time To Die is probably the middle of the films for this reviewer.  It’s a good movie for me, filled with some form fitting action, fantastic look and Bond feels, and characters that have a lot more layers than previous incarnations I have seen.  Acting wise it is solid and drama wise, it works super well with touching on the story element of her majesty’s most lethal weapon.  However, this installment still does not quite hit all the boxes of Bond quality that others have, primarily due to how much is trying to be integrated into this final film.  Small things like the predictability of the story or limited gadgets/Bond mode guns are a tad limiting, but it primarily has to do with the story and character usage for me in this film.  My favorite characters with blended comedy, action, and acting are sort of sidelined, and the villains are not the most impressive compared to the champions of the MI-6 legacy.  In addition, the story both works and is a bit busier than I had hoped, almost needing more time to adequately finish those moments they touched on.  Still given special effects, pacing, and story, this reviewer encourages a theater watch for No Time To Die and certainly adding to this to the library later down the road.  

My scores are: 

Action/Adventure/Thriller:  7.5 – 8.0

Movie Overall:  7.0